CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
Keep on Top of the Latest Certification News: Subscribe to CertCities.com Newsletter Share share | bookmark | e-mail
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  Newsletters
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Press Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

See What's New on
Redmondmag.com!

Cover Story: IE8: Behind the 8 Ball

Tech-Ed: Let's (Third) Party!

A Secure Leap into the Cloud

Windows Mobile's New Moves

SQL Speed Secrets


CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... Columns ..Column Story Saturday: April 5, 2014


 Certification Advisor  
Greg Neilson
Greg Neilson


 Microsoft’s New Simulation Questions: Report from the Field
Greg takes on Microsoft's new simulation questions, shares his experience and invites you to do the same.
by Greg Neilson  
5/11/2005 -- In my last column I told you about my enthusiasm for the new simulation questions that Microsoft was introducing. Now that I’ve taken a Microsoft exam containing simulation questions, I wanted to share my experience with you.

There were a handful of simulation questions contained on the 70-290 exam I recently took. When preparing, I actually anticipated that there would be more on the exam, but now that I’ve taken it I see how time consuming these questions are to complete -- having more than a handful could easily have been overkill, detracting from the remainder of the exam content. Windows Server 2003 is a huge product, so there’s a great breadth of material to test candidates on.

Speaking of content, you’ll find no shortage of administration coverage on this exam. Aside from the simulations, there were a number of drag-and-drop and other questions where candidates are expected to use error messages or a properties page from the GUI to deliver the correct outcome. By my reckoning, approximately a quarter of the exam makes candidates work directly with the Windows Server 2003 GUI performing administration tasks -- this should go a long way to further refute the accusation that these exams lead to paper certifications and don’t test real-world skills.

The simulation questions themselves were straightforward, although they do take more time than a regular multiple choice question to complete, as mentioned above (you will still have plenty of time, though). The exam objectives suggest the types of exam questions you may be asked, so in that regard none of the simulation areas I encountered were completely unexpected.

As for the simulation technology itself, I thought it ran well, but I did run into a few things. For one, I found that the relevant admin tools for the simulation can only be launched from the normal Windows menus. When I attempted to launch a tool by name from the Run menu, I got a VBScript error. This isn't a big deal, but it is something to be aware of.

I also discovered an interesting side effect of the simulation software. When answering one of the simulation questions, I misread it and attempted to do something outside of what was being asked. Because I was working in a simulation environment and not the real Windows GUI, the simulation GUI didn’t respond to my action. This lack of response made me realize I’d read the question wrong: When nothing happened, I went back, read it again, and selected the correct option. In this situation, the limits of the simulation helped me; however, I would imagine that as Microsoft gets more experience in setting these types of questions, this “safety net” may not be something you can count on in the future.

Overall, I feel these new types of simulation exam questions are a good addition, but I don’t want to overstate their importance. They’re another welcome development in improving Microsoft’s certification testing, which was already pretty solid.

Before you take a Microsoft exam containing simulations, make sure you check out Microsoft’s demo that also functions as a tutorial here. Two of the current exams (70-290 and 70-291) currently contain simulations, with another two (70-293 and 70-294) scheduled to be updated by June. For those of you who have taken exams these new exams with simulations, let me know what you thought by posting your thoughts below. I’d also be interested in your general thoughts on how you think these questions will (or won’t) improve the validity of Microsoft testing.


Greg Neilson, MCSE+Internet, MCNE, PCLP, is a Contributing Editor for Microsoft Certified Professional Magazine and a manager at a large IT services firm in Australia. He's the author of Lotus Domino Administration in a Nutshell (O'Reilly and Associates, ISBN 1-56592-717-6). You can reach him at Attn: Greg.

 


More articles by Greg Neilson:

-- advertisement --


There are 44 CertCities.com user Comments for “Microsoft’s New Simulation Questions: Report from the Field”
Page 1 of 5
5/11/05: Kurt Hudson from Tempe, AZ says: Several people I have trained have failed the simulation exams. I took the simulation exam to check it out as well. I passed by a good margin, but honestly, my score probably should have been higher. On one of the simuations I was unable to complete a task (the interface simply didn't work). These people I trained all failed the exam, but they came close to passing (within 50 points). Everyone of them reported that they had VBScript errors, that interface problems caused them several issues, and that things "could not be done" that needed to be done to complete the exam. I think the exams are a flop. I felt that the IIS 4.0 simulations that they put out sucked as well. I think I ended up taking that exam three times. Twice I failed and suspicously enough both those times the exam failed on me while I was taking it. The third time I was able to complete the exam and I passed. Until Microsoft bites the bullet and gets a real lab environment or at least finds a way to use and grade Virtual PCs, they will not have a test that is any better than what they had before the simulations. As a matter of fact, these new simulations are worse than not having them. Kurt Hudson, MCSE 2003, 2000, NT4, NT351, etc.
5/16/05: Doug Forsyth from Denver, CO says: I took the test and failed the first time. 185 min in the testing center is brutal. The administrator of the testing center told me that she is seeing about a 90% failure rate on 290. Now I don't know how accurate that is or if she was just trying to make me feel better or what. Couple of things that I learned in a hurry. Brush up or learn how to do those things that you don't do in your regular job. It's one thing to know how roaming profiles work and another to have actually done them. I think overall the sim's were good. I would however like to know if I actually passed on those. -Doug Forsyth MCSE 4.0
5/16/05: Jayman from NYC NY says: Took the exam (without simulations) and failed, went back a week later and passed (I am of the opinion because of the simulations). I did not get any script errors but when attempting complete one of the sims I could not get it to work. Marked and went ahead. Returned to it with about 1 hour left in the exam, reset it and tried every icon I saw and the darn thing did not work. I am all for simulations but please let it behave as the realworld guis do but then again there is a practical way and a microsoft way of doing things.
5/19/05: César Centeno S. from Barranquilla, Colombia says: I took both 290 and 291 with simulations. In each exam I had 3 simulations and 5 of them worked flawlwsly, however on one of the simulations (the first one I encountered, just for the record) It gave me a VB error whenever I tried to do something that would lead to the same result, eventualy I had to select the tools I wanted from the start menu and it worked.
5/24/05: Mark from MN says: The sims are very resonable and seem to encapsulate several concepts at once. Without the details of why, I am under the impression that you will not pass a test if a sim question is not adequately answered. Having failed one, I still consider the sims fair and an excellent addition to the test. I highly recomend practicing hands on labs before the test if you haven't worked with the topic you're studying before.
5/31/05: John says: MS certs are now getting really out of hand. For new people they are not worth the paper they are printed on - the salaries for MCSE's are quite pathetic if you have no experience. And skillsets of MCSE with no real world experience are quite pathetic too. And even with experience the top rates of pay have been coming down as more and more MCSE's appear on the scene. From my view, solid industry experience is far more valuable than any indvidual who simply managed to pass a exam, simulation or otherwise! Sure there are some significant differences from 2000 to 2003 but its really the same beast. I would say to people with MCSE level understanding of W2K - don't bother even doing the courses let alone the exams - just read and use the product. Waste of time. Better off studying Linux!
6/1/05: Anonymous says: I took the 290 exam on May 31 and failed. The simulations did not return a VBscript error - just could not do what they asked. At least not in the standard method of doing it. A question about doing tape daily backups - stated something to the effect that it would cost to get your restored tape from an outside service - so what the fastest and most effective method. The question was not a question of what method does what - but if you could factor in an accounting question... come on Microsoft! Ask the questions in a straight foward way! Total sims was - about handful. Took me a long time - 3hours and 45 mins. Did everyone get that long. I now know what to study for the retake.
6/4/05: Anonymous says: Took exam 70-290 and failed. Simulation exams should have every possible way of completing a task available. Not just one way. In some of the questions I was unable to complete the task as I would normally do it doing my job. That doesnt make sense to me.
6/7/05: Anonymous says: passed simulation exam. still, its too "microsoftian" - there are other ways of performing the same task. some of the questions were terrribly constructed in the ssense that depending on an assumed situaion one could select at least 2 possible outcomes. However the correct answer is always the MS way outcome. More attention needs to be paid to how others besides MS - the actual administrators - use MS products.
6/7/05: John says: Heres a folloup to my earlier claim: http://www.mcpmag.com/salarysurveys/2004/charts/chart1.asp Notice that non-MS certified people actually make more $$$ on average than certified folks (except if you are cert in Visual Studio) - again showwing that MS Certs are not worth the paper they are printed on!
First Page   Next Page   Last Page
Your comment about: “Microsoft’s New Simulation Questions: Report from the Field”
Name: (optional)
Location: (optional)
E-mail Address: (optional)
Comment:
   

-- advertisement (story continued below) --

top