CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
Post Your Mind in the CertCities.com Forums Share share | bookmark | e-mail
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  Newsletters
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Press Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

See What's New on
Redmondmag.com!

Cover Story: IE8: Behind the 8 Ball

Tech-Ed: Let's (Third) Party!

A Secure Leap into the Cloud

Windows Mobile's New Moves

SQL Speed Secrets


CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... Features ..Feature Story Thursday: April 3, 2014


About Those U.S. Government Security Clearances...
U.S. security clearances are one of the most sought after qualifications for security jobs today, but they're also extremely hard to come by. Here's the basic facts about how the process works, as well as scams to watch out for.


by Dian Schaffhauser

3/10/2004 -- You've found a job whose description fits you perfectly except for one small matter: It requires a U.S. security clearance, and you don't have one. As with many things in life, getting this particular position would be a long shot for you, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't try anyway.

The fact is that security clearance is something you can't obtain for yourself. Your current or prospective employer has to set the wheels in motion to get it for you. Since the process is costly and time-consuming, organizations won't do it unless it's absolutely essential. Let's review the basics.

You typically need a security clearance when you hold a sensitive position within the federal government or when you work for a government contractor or some other organization that has access to classified information or deal with other restricted information relating to national security. Clearances come in many different flavors, primarily confidential, secret, top secret and sensitive compartmented information (SCI).

Up until the beginning of October 2003, the Department of Defense ran its own security clearance operation. Now that's been handed over to the Office of Personnel Management (OPM).

Once a person has been offered a position that requires a clearance, the employer opens up a request with the OPM through a federal security officer. The OPM gives the candidate undergoing the clearance check access to an online system called e-Qip, or Electronic Questionnaire for Investigations Processing, a digital version of Standard Form 86.

SF 86 is a 13-page document that asks you to list your vitals-name, social security number, place of birth, etc., and then drills down on your personal history going back at least seven years. (To see a PDF edition of the form, go here). You're expected to list where you've lived for the last seven years, where you went to school, your employment activities -- including titles, supervisor names and supervisor addresses -- people who know you well aside from spouses and relatives, relatives and associates (along with their dates of birth, country of birth and current address), your military history and foreign activities (including travel for business and pleasure), police records, medical records, financial records and delinquencies, use of illegal drugs and alcohol, and groups you associate with that espouse the violent overthrow of the government.

Sound comprehensive? The idea is to weed out those who aren't, according to SF 86, "reliable, trustworthy, of good conduct and character, and loyal to the United States." The same form also warns that your current employer will be contacted and questioned, whether you want them to be or not.

Your form and your fingerprints then go to the Federal Investigations Processing Center, which calls on investigators, both federal employees and contract, to start confirming what you've said on the form. During this phase of the process, investigators review available records (including your presence on the Internet), check with the police, run a credit check on your and talk to people who know you -- those you've listed on the form as well as people in a position to observe you, such as neighbors. Plus, you'll be interviewed yourself.

All the data that's collected ends up in a single file, called "The Report of Investigation," which is sent to the federal agency that asked for the investigation in the first place. At that point, it's up to the federal security officer at the agency of hire to determine your eligibility to have a position with access to secure information. You may get the chance to explain or refute negative or unclear information during this "adjudication phase." Then your clearance is either granted or denied.

If it's granted, the fun doesn't stop there. Depending on what level of clearance you have, you'll have to undergo reinvestigation every five, 10 or 15 years. If you leave that position, the clearance is still active, but it may not be usable by your next employer depending on what type of security clearance the new job requires. Let enough time pass and the clearance will have no merit at all. The next time around you'll have to start at the beginning again. You can't simply request a renewal of your security clearance. You have to be employed in a position in which it's required.

The whole process of obtaining a clearance can take many months -- sometimes longer than a year -- and cost several thousands (even tens of thousands) of dollars. The more sensitive the job, the deeper -- and the costlier and more time-consuming -- the investigation. You can't speed up the effort, nor can you offer to pay the cost. That's why so many jobs listing security clearance as a requirement are anxious to find candidates who already possess a clearance of the right type -- the project may be over by the time somebody new to the process obtains his or her clearance. If you've noticed the propensity of government contractors to intensely recruit ex-military people for open positions, it's because vets frequently come with the security clearance that's needed as part of their portfolio.

Recruiting firms, attorneys or other companies that promise for a fee to obtain a security clearance for you or "pre-approve" you for a security clearance are scams. Don't fall for their antics.

If you don't already have a security clearance but there's a particular organization you're determined to work for, your best approach is to obtain employment that doesn't require the clearance with the agency or firm. Then put in your time and make it clear to your manager that should the right opportunity present itself, you'd be willing to undergo the investigation. But temper your enthusiasm. Too much eagerness to undergo this in-depth exploration into your personal and professional life might be viewed as suspicious behavior.

Originally published in Dec. 2003 as part of "CertCities.com's Security Certificaiton Resource Guide," available for download (PDF format) here.


Dian Schaffhauser is the editorial director of Microsoft Certified Professional Magazine, CertCities.com, TCPMag.com and ENTmag.com. She can be reached at .

There are 1441 CertCities.com user Comments for “About Those U.S. Government Security Clearances...”
Page 2 of 145
3/22/04: anonymous says: I've got a question about felonies. I'm being offered a job at a defense contractor that requires Secret Clearance. They are totally willing to go through the process. My concern is this. Thougout my whole past, the only thing I've ever been arrested for is DUI's, which happened 7 years ago in a span of 11 months. Father just passed away was going through a real rough time. Anyway, I had 3 of them in those 11 months with the last one constituting a felony and 5 months in county jail and NO probabtion after that. My question is whether I have a shot at getting secret clearance or not. As for credit, my score is in the mid-700's. Would like to know if I'm automatically disqualified. thanks.
3/24/04: mike from DC says: Hey anonymouse 3/22/04 go for but just be sure you tell them before hand. If it will be a problem they will let you know. Worst they can say is NO just don't try to cover it up. I have known of people get turned down once before they got cleared, so if they do tell you no up front ask if it is becouse the government rule or the company you are working for.
3/26/04: MC11 from CA says: I am applying for a fed job which requires clearance, I got a DUI couple yrs ago (college days) and have a debt of around 20K among me and my wife, but our combined income is around 80K, does anyone think i would have a problem getting thur security clearance (primary).
3/27/04: Anonymous says: People should have thought about their futures and security clearences before they broke the law. The government does not like people with a history of drug or alcohol abuse in positions of trust. National Security and a safer world is high on the agenda.
3/27/04: Anonymous says: Despite the hard line that Anonymous (3/27) takes, you don't always know what road your life will go down, and things happen. It's unrealistic to think that you'll bever make a mistake and the government knows this. When I was 20, I never in my wildest dreams thought I'd ever need a clearance for work. How could I? As far as Decipher's response to my saying there is a "fudge factor", what I meant by this was that if you honestly forget a detail, they'll come back and say "we need this information" in order to continue. I was not suggesting that you attempt a cover up. For example, they asked for my Selective Service number. I registered in 1980 and I had no idea what it was, much less where to get it. They kicked it out and said to find it. We eventually did find and provided it and the investigation picked upt from there. As far as a felony is concerned, I don't THINK the government will issue a clearance if you have one, but I'm not positive and there's certainly no reason not to try. With regards to debt, the government is looking for serious debt, something that will make you a possible target to accept a bribe. Is there a specific dollar amount? I don't know. It's probably on a case by case basis.
3/29/04: mike from DC says: Hey you got to remeber it is not only the government that makes the choice the company does too. Lets say you aply for a job at Lockheed martin and they do a background check and say you do have a DUI the agent that does the check may be like "Ok no big deal it was a long time ago and your good". Now when they take that info to Lockheed lockheed may be lick "Hell no we don't want to have someone with a DUI working here and you get denied even tho you passed the government clearence. Long story short if you have something in your backgraound tell them up front and they will tell you if it is a problem, and if they say it is ask them if it is due to government rules your the company.
3/31/04: Decipher says: Well, yes and no to the above post. If, after the DUI, you're granted a clearance from the government and you show that to the company, the company is going to hire you. The simple fact is that there just isn't that many cleared folks walking around. Especially cleared folks with the technical backgrounds needed to fill these positions. I'm in the environment, this is first hand knowledge, and I tell it like I see it. That being said, the chances of someone getting a new clearance with a DUI, drug felony record, and/or serious indebtedness is slim to none. We just don't need those kinds of people working for us and/or with us. I say this because people with these types of issues bring their stress to work and it degrades their performance; not to mention making them a security threat. Like it or not, that's just the way it is. Decipher.
3/31/04: Insider from Washington DC says: Government security clearances are used by managers to bypass federal labor laws and are use to obtain your private, medical, and personnal information for their own benefit or others. Your information "IS NOT PROTECTED". Abuse of these clearances and the information from them is widespread and growing! Beware what you say, know that the Boss knows everything about you and will take advantage of it, while you know nothing about them or where your information is going too. You have been warned!
3/31/04: mike from DC says: Decipher I agree with you 100% there are not enough cleared techs. My point was only that you shouldn't be scared about tring to get a clearance. And some people think that if you are turned down you can never get one, I know a guy at the CIA who was turned down a few times. It turns out the government cleared him but his job didn't then after a few years of being good he was cleared by both. Thats another reson to ask who denied you if you are turned down if it was the company they might say after so long after what ever you did they may hirer you or they may give you a name of a company where they may let it slide.
4/1/04: takeaguess from westofeast says: What you will be providing to prospective employers AND the government, is EXACTLY what Mr Ashcroft would like to know about 300Million Americans. Don't do it.
First Page   Previous Page     Next Page   Last Page
Your comment about: “About Those U.S. Government Security Clearances...”
Name: (optional)
Location: (optional)
E-mail Address: (optional)
Comment:
   

-- advertisement (story continued below) --

top