CertCities.com  -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
Free CertCities.com Newsletter via E-mail Share share | bookmark | e-mail
 Microsoft®
 Cisco®
 Security
 Oracle®
 A+/Network+™
 Linux/Unix
 More Certs
 Newsletters
 Salary Surveys
 Forums
 News
 Exam Reviews
 Tips
 Columns
 Features
 PopQuiz
 RSS Feeds
 Press Releases
 Contributors
 About Us
 Search
 

Advanced Search
 Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

See What's New on
Redmondmag.com!

Cover Story: IE8: Behind the 8 Ball

Tech-Ed: Let's (Third) Party!

A Secure Leap into the Cloud

Windows Mobile's New Moves

SQL Speed Secrets


CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:
ccfeedback@certcities.com


 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... News ..News Story Friday: September 10, 2010

  • PRINTABLE FORMAT
  • E-MAIL STORY
  • POST YOUR COMMENTS
  • MORE NEWS

  • Breaking News: Taiwan-Based Braindumpers Arrested


    2/6/2004 -- The China Post is reporting today that four Taiwanese citizens have been arrested for selling IT certification exams questions through the Internet and for taking exams for other individuals.

    According to the story, the four in custody -- Tung Pei-chang, 41; Hsu Ching-ping, 27; Hsiung Chih-yuan, 34; and "a man surnamed" Chang, 34 -- were arrested yesterday in various locations throughout Taiwan. Charges are fraud and copyright law.

    -- advertisement (story continued below) --

    The China Post article said that the groups sold the questions through the Web sites Test4U.net, TaipeiITtest.net and OPASScertification.net since 2001. According to the report, the sites boasted that the questions they sold were taken directly from Pearson Vue and Prometric test centers in various countries worldwide. The sites are currently offline.

    It also states that in May the group began charging candidates TND $10,000 (around U.S. $300) to take exams in their place, employing a network of proxy test-takers and providing the service for about 300 clients in Taiwan.

    Both enterprises resulted in revenues of around TND $5,000,000 (approximately U.S. $150,000), prosecutors say.

    The China Post says that authorities were notified about the sites in Sept. of last year, but did not say whom the complaint came from.

    This is the first known arrest of an overseas provider of IT certification exam questions (a.k.a. braindumps). There have been two high-profile U.S. criminal investigations, including one arrest: Robert Keppel, who owned Cheet-Sheets.com, pled guilty to a felony charge of theft of trade secrets in early 2003 and was sentenced to a year in prison. In another high-profile case, Garry Neale, then-owner of TroyTec.com and Testkiller.com, had his assets seized in June 2002 as part of a criminal investigation based on a complaint filed by Microsoft. Neale has not been charged.

    These two incidents virtually quashed the U.S. braindump market, but overseas providers flourished, taking advantage of disparities between U.S. copyright laws and those in other countries, as well as the difficulties in prosecuting non-U.S. providers. This case is the first visible sign that some progress has been made on the international front.

    At the Association of Test Publisher's conference earlier this week, this reporter talked to several IT certification security experts who hinted that things may be changing shortly for international braindump providers, but none referred to specific cases. Jack Killorin, Prometric's vice president of Worldwide Security, did remark in an interview that the industry has been looking at using criminal charges other than theft of trade secrets -- such as fraud, conspiracy and falsifying documents -- to pursue such cases, a tactic that has been successfully applied in at least one criminal case involving a higher-education entrance exam. "Do I care if they're charged with violating trade secrets or fraud...? No," he said. "I only care that they're behind bars."

    CertCities.com is working on finding out more about this case and will bring it to you shortly. The China Post article can be found here.  -Becky Nagel



    There are 68 CertCities.com user Comments for “Breaking News: Taiwan-Based Braindumpers Arrested”
    Page 7 of 7
    4/5/04: Anonymous says:See another response from above by a guy that used braindumps but won't now admit it. What a joke.
    4/12/04: Sylvain from UK says:Guys, Simple: You have to know your stuff. You can use dump so long as you are just checking if ready. Not trying to remember the questions. Right? I have worked with doctors. I have even been to the doctor's before. I have worked in emergency departments. Doctors know their stuff. You pass an exam you have to know it all. Period. No ifs and buts you have to know it all. If you don't know or you are unsure or have to check on the net for the answer, it is ok for not everyday stuff once in a while. Other you're worth nothing.
    4/26/04: Leroy Joseph, Jr. from Houston, TX says:In response to Sylvian from UK. Some corrections and clarifications are in order. Doctors' first of all spend many many years as "INTERNS" and working under the watchful eye of SENIOR DOCTORS learning and perfecting their "skills and crafts" to prepare for passing that exam. If the same requirement was imposed on potential MCSE's the term "Paper MCSE" would mean a "prestigious accomplishment" instead of the "cheater Brain Dumper" label so many of us individuals have tagged it with. I for one who have been in the IT industry when Microsoft was battling IBM over the right to use IBM DOS or CPM in PC's (Bill wrote his own version of DOS soon after), Besides the point.. However most of the people are complaining about the "paper Certs" only because they are willing to accept the same job at a lower salary. (Paper certs could be an "INTERN") in some companies. However due to the large volume of enterprises moving from Novell to Windows on their primary OS the demand for Microsoft certified individuals have rose and hence the paper certified person. I'm not discounting that and MCSE on NT 4 under pressure from that individual's employer to obtain or maintain a certain number of certified people would possibly think about using such material to pass the exam. In case you're wondering, I do hold multiple/several certifications that includes; Microsoft's: MCSE, MCDBA, MCSA, MCP. Novell's: 5 Master CNE's, 3 CNE's, 3 CNA's, Specialist-BorderManager, Certified Salesperson. Compaq/Hewlett Packard: 2 Master ASE's, 5 ASE's, 4 AIS's and 3 APS. The certification list also includes: Cisco, IBM, Dell, CompTIA, CIW, Citrix and others.
    5/4/04: Anonymous says:Paper MCSEs don't get jobs: they don't pass interviews. Don't worry about them. Braindumps and testking-type sites exist to help experienced techs get past the certification hurdle with a minimum output of time and money so they can focus on real work and real IT problem solving.
    2/19/05: Anonymous says:This question of braindumps would have been a none issue if the test-givers were not so lazy and probably budget-conscious. Why can't they come up with new questions more frequently in order to stay one step ahead of the braindump sites? By doing this they will eventually end up with a very large pool of questions, which very few people will be able to memorize anyway. As far as paper MCSE's are concerned I don't see why that should bother anyone except the person who is foolish enough to employ them. No certificate proves that someone can do a job. It is the job of a good technical interviewer to know whether an interviewee will be able to perform on the job. For me therefore, there is no need to lose sleep over a paper MSCEs; the problem is with recruitment. Recruiters should be able to find out people who don't have the skills needed for a particular job.
    4/12/06: df from dff says:bv
    7/24/06: Khan the Codemonkey says:I think there's a lot of question begging going on. First who makes the exam? Someone really skilled at constructing questions that truly measure something meaningful? Answer: not usually. I've been asked to help author questions for the MCSD exams, but Prometric and or Microsoft weren't to pay anything. Which tells me, that the people who actually end up writing the questions may be the least qualified...they were just the ones that would do it for minimum wage. I've been taking MS exams since 1994, and I've yet to see a development exam that truly tests for skills used in a typical company. An average developer wouldn't pass a typical exam, even if they were very skilled. Knowing how to pass the exam and being a good developer are 2 different things. Maybe the other certs are different but I doubt it. I've seen too many idiots with certifications that can't do anything useful. Bottom Line: Those with money will buy the legal braindumps; transcender, MeasureUp, etc. Those companies pay someone to take exams, then reverse engineer questions that are similar to the real ones, but different enough to not get sued or arrested. Those without money, will find other ways to pass. I suggest study, but not to learn...Studying to pass an exam is very different than studying to learn the material.
    12/26/06: Zahoor Ahmad from Pakistan says:So informative
    First Page   Previous Page     Last Page
    Your comment about: “Breaking News: Taiwan-Based Braindumpers Arrested”
    Name: (optional)
    Location: (optional)
    E-mail Address: (optional)
    Comment:
       

    -- advertisement (story continued below) --

    top