CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
Post Your Mind in the CertCities.com Forums Share share | bookmark | e-mail
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  Newsletters
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Press Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

See What's New on
Redmondmag.com!

Cover Story: IE8: Behind the 8 Ball

Tech-Ed: Let's (Third) Party!

A Secure Leap into the Cloud

Windows Mobile's New Moves

SQL Speed Secrets


CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... Columns ..Column Story Saturday: April 5, 2014


 Certification Advisor  
Greg Neilson
Greg Neilson


 2004: A Look Ahead
Greg shares his thoughts on the promises and challenges IT professionals will face this year.
by Greg Neilson  
1/5/2004 -- Happy New Year! I trust you have all had a great holiday break with your friends and families. Now it's time to get down to work...

There appears to be two main trends that will shape our life in IT this year. The first trend is the view that IT spending is set to increase in 2004. Although this has been predicted for every year since 2001, there does seem to be more consensus that it will happen this year. Of course, we all hope that this is true, but even at my most pessimistic this does at least suggest that things won't get any worse this year.

The second major trend is the continued growth in offshore outsourcing. I'm not sure that this will happen as quickly as some of the industry analysts are predicting, but it is undeniable that this is will happen -- the economics are too difficult to ignore.

Although there has been some disquiet in political circles, I don't think that this alone will be enough to stem the tide. The same pattern is emerging in a broad range of fields: legal, medical, call centers, and film production as well as IT. And of course, in the last 30 years we have seen a similar occurrence in manufacturing.

Although I don't want to appear to say that we as individuals can't make a difference here politically, in this forum I would suggest that we accept this as a given and formulate plans on how we will adapt to these changing circumstances.

I think that there will always be a need for local IT staff; however those most at risk from this reduction in demand for IT staff are those with low skills, low levels of job performance and/or doing repetitive tasks that can be easily documented and done by others. Therefore I would suggest that the key to staying employable in IT now is to have higher skills, higher levels of job performance and/or getting closer to how the technology is used in business (project management, analysis, design and architecture, etc).

Putting these two trends together I admit does give a mixed view of our future. However, I'm still quietly confident about continuing to work in IT as long as I can continue to demonstrate real business benefits from my labors. But I am not kidding myself that I will always have a position in IT no matter what (especially since I probably have another 25 years until retirement!).That's why it's always a good idea for all of us to keep an eye out regularly on the emerging trends and how these may affect our future employability. In my own case, I have already changed careers before (moving from civil engineering into IT), and one day I may want to do the same again, however at the moment I don't see a need for this.

In my certification plans in 2004, I'm already working towards completing the Security+ certification. Last year I updated my major certifications, so at the moment I don't see many other compelling certification options that will be of benefit to me in my career. I expect that much of Security+ content will be old news to me, but I'm also expecting a lot of the material to put some structure around what I already do know and also to force me to look deeper into other areas that will be useful to me in my career.

What are your plans for 2004? Let me know by adding your thoughts below.


Greg Neilson, MCSE+Internet, MCNE, PCLP, is a Contributing Editor for Microsoft Certified Professional Magazine and a manager at a large IT services firm in Australia. He's the author of Lotus Domino Administration in a Nutshell (O'Reilly and Associates, ISBN 1-56592-717-6). You can reach him at Attn: Greg.

 


More articles by Greg Neilson:

-- advertisement --


There are 46 CertCities.com user Comments for “2004: A Look Ahead”
Page 1 of 5
1/13/04: Anonymous from South Florida says: I have a CCNA, MCP, and Network+ Next FOR 2004 I plan to get Security+ real soon in the coming weeks. Also MCSE, MCSA, and Linux+
1/13/04: Smoky McPot says: Good for you. Here, puff puff give.
1/14/04: Only thing worth doing says: Completing my masters amigo...then I'll see what needs to be done after that. Hopefully I cut up a lime or two, drink a few Coronas and just chill for a few months.
1/14/04: ChicagoMCSE says: Just the very fact that he actually thinks that any CompTIA certification is anything less than hideously expensive toilet paper is proof positive that that you should completely discount anything that he has to say. This exam and all other "plus" exams merit only contempt in the IT industry. More and more ads are stating that "plus" certifications will NOT be considered. Don't believe me? Read through the job ads on Monster.com.
1/14/04: Prove it ChicagoMCSE says: I certainly don't hold CompTIA exams in high regard, but I haven't seen an add that states "plus" certifications will NOT be considered. Next time, give us proof or shut your mouth.
1/14/04: Eric Laughlin says: Actually, ChicagoMCSE may actually be right. I can't remember the specific job ads per se but when I was conducting an "MCSE and Exchange" search on monster, I recall seeing adds that stated something or other like "this is NOT an entry level "plus" certifications position. Applicant MUST have current MCSE with Exchange elective....". I've seen this quite a few times but it has always been in the context of trying to discourage unexperienced candidates from applying for jobs for which they are completely unsuited. My take on the situation is that the companies were trying to ensure that they applicants had top-level certifications only on their resume. Realistically, anyone who has higher ranking certs will use those exclusively on their resume. If you have an MCSE you wouldn't list MCP and likewise for CCNP's not using CCNA. ChicagoMCSE could have certainly phrased his objection a bit more diplomatically but I would have to say on this one - he's right, although once again I think the point of the ads was that inexperienced candidates shouldn't apply rather than CompTIA certs are inherently useless. Although, I too believe that they are both a waste of time and money.
1/15/04: ChicagoMCSE says: Eric - thanks, buddy! Prove it - F*ck you, a**hole.
1/14/04: Prove it ChicagoMCSE and Eric Laughlin says: I'm still waiting...um, a-hole! To me, you're just the typical discourager who has a certain cert and doesn't want junior IT folks to catch up with you and pass you by. Sorry, the world doesn't stop for you......
1/15/04: Anonymous from South Florida says: See in my situation I'm in the field at a terrific company, and the more I have the more $ Plus Comptia exams contribute to the MCSE and MCSA exams, so they count towards something!!!! Certs plus hands on expierence you can't loose not even to INDIA!!!!!!!
1/15/04: ATMRules from Mass says: I have 10 years experience in supporting layer 2 and 3. I have my CCNA, I bought the study materials for Network plus, is this cert really worth it?, it seems the only cert from comptia is A plus, if you're in the local IT(WHAT I MEAN BEFORE THE ROUTER)....
First Page   Next Page   Last Page
Your comment about: “2004: A Look Ahead”
Name: (optional)
Location: (optional)
E-mail Address: (optional)
Comment:
   

-- advertisement (story continued below) --

top