CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
Post Your Mind in the CertCities.com Forums Share share | bookmark | e-mail
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  Newsletters
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Press Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

See What's New on
Redmondmag.com!

Cover Story: IE8: Behind the 8 Ball

Tech-Ed: Let's (Third) Party!

A Secure Leap into the Cloud

Windows Mobile's New Moves

SQL Speed Secrets


CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... Columns ..Column Story Saturday: April 5, 2014


 Certification Advisor  
Greg Neilson
Greg Neilson


 Closing Time
Now that 2004 is almost over, Greg looks ahead to 2005 and beyond: What technologies should you be preparing for?
by Greg Neilson  
12/14/2004 -- Whoa! December already? Where did 2004 go? As the year comes to a close, it’s a good time for all of us to reflect on the year passed and our plans for 2005.

Our industry moves on, and it’s up to each of us to understand where it is headed and what we intend to do about it. At this time of the year, you’ll likely see lots of predictions from commentators on hot areas for the coming year. (And of course at CertCities.com, we’ve just completed our own survey of the 10 Hottest Certifications for 2005). Taken alone these are mostly educated guesses on the future, but when you see common threads emerge between these disparate sources then maybe they are onto something that we need to consider. Often, the issue is not the likely success of that technology in the future, it’s the timing—it may take far longer than the coming year for the technology to emerge into the mainstream.

There are a couple of main reasons for considering a move to something different in the future. One is that you’re getting bored doing the same stuff day in and day out and think it would be more challenging and exciting to learn something else. The other is that you feel the areas that you specialise in now are slowing—or worse—possibly in decline. If you take a longer term view of your career in IT, it is very likely that you’ll be retraining in something over the next five to 10 years. The question is to what and when.

When I think about the career trajectories of some of my current and former colleagues, in retrospect it’s amazing to see the paths taken. For example, one person over the last decade has moved from messaging to directory services and is now in identity management. Or take another person who has gone from server administration to Notes administration to line management and now to project management. And then there are others who’ve moved from mainframe PL/1 programming to C++ and now Java.

I think the key to much of this movement is while the individual technologies and products change quickly, the professional disciplines behind them change much more slowly and are largely transferable. There is a great deal of your existing skills and experience that can be leveraged for new roles in the future. For example, if you’re currently a proficient DBA in Oracle and are interested in moving to, say, MySQL or SQL Server, much of what you already know is still relevant and the main things you need to pick up are specific implementation details of the new product. Similarly, a move to a security specialization isn’t a large leap from network support and implementation or systems administration. Sure, there’s much to learn, but there’s much you already know.

As for my own development plans in the coming year, I’m not sure yet what part, if any, will be done using certification (I’m still pondering whether to get the Citrix CCA in 2005). Over the coming holiday break, two current technologies I want to learn more about are SAN and VoIP. I only have a conceptual view of both of these and am finding that the majority of my clients have or will be implementing these in the future.

I also want to learn more about the current status of grid computing. This is still an evolving area, but there have been significant developments over the past few years, and I want to better understand where it is now, how it's being applied today and where it’s likely headed.

In terms of formal education, I completed my MBA this year, and next year I’ll be taking a course on technology management. While I don’t see myself performing a management role indefinitely, I think whatever role I take on in the future will often be advising those that are, so this is an area that combines my interests in both technology and business.

Have a great holiday break with your friends and family, and I’ll see you back again in 2005. What do you plan to do next year? Let me know by posting your thoughts below.


Greg Neilson, MCSE+Internet, MCNE, PCLP, is a Contributing Editor for Microsoft Certified Professional Magazine and a manager at a large IT services firm in Australia. He's the author of Lotus Domino Administration in a Nutshell (O'Reilly and Associates, ISBN 1-56592-717-6). You can reach him at Attn: Greg.

 


More articles by Greg Neilson:

-- advertisement --


There are 25 CertCities.com user Comments for “Closing Time”
Page 1 of 3
1/3/05: strauchr from Australia says: After a big year of achievements for me personally I am left a little bit perplexed as to what to do next. In 2004 I have achieved MCSE in 2000 then upgraded that to MCSE 2003, CCA, CWNA and finally finished my Diploma in IT (Network Engineering). But like you I am very interested in the business side of things as well as Project Management. I'm not quite sure I'm ready for either yet but I also feel drained of the Network Support/Engineering roles I have had for the last 5 years. So therefore this leaves me wondering whether to try and get some formal qualifications and training for business and/or project management or to keep pursuing IT certifications and let myself work up the ladder naturally. Advice from someone with your experience would be very useful.
1/30/05: strauchr says: Hmmmm, guess not then
2/3/05: praet123 from w. australia says: Hi strauchr, I too am from Australia and would like some advice from you! :) I am wishing to pursue a MCSE certification, but I have sourced so many companies offering either in-class training (Expensive!!!) or computer based cdrom training. Can you tell me how you received your training? It wld be great to get advice from an end-user rather than a companies jumping down my throat claiming they are better than other companies providing training with their high pressure sales tactics. thanks!
2/3/05: praet123 says: Anyone that has undergone MCSE or MCP training I'd like to hear how you obtained your certiications, or what your opinion of classbased versus computerbased cdrom teaching. My email is: [email protected]
2/4/05: gneilson from Sydney, Australia says: strauchr - Sorry about the delay in responding. I had been on holidays in January and also busy taking exams for the MCSE: Security path (more on this in my next column). Learning more about business is a great idea no matter what path you choose for the future. As for project management, it really depends on how structured you are with your thinking and how you feel about working through others to get things done. For those suited to the role it can be a great option to grow into for the future - otherwise it can be very painful. An alternative option to move away from a support role but to leverage your existing technical skills is to move into a architect or solution designer type of role. This is one area that a business focus can really help - it is a huge leap to move from hands-on technical work to then be able to make reasoned design decisions on the optimum technical solution to meet a given business requirement.
2/10/05: Greg from Sydney, Australia says: praet123 - It really depends, there is no one single answer to this. Only you know your existing technical background and specific Windows experience. Classroom education is expensive (especially when you also consider the opportunity cost of your time spent sitting in a classroom) and time-consuming, as you point out. But it can be particularly useful to rapidly learn about something which you know little beforehand, and can also be useful in providing a large lab environment to play with. When I first moved into networking from programming, I took a few Netware 3.12 and Lan Server courses (yes, that shows my age!), but since then I've only taken a couple of Microsoft classes on specific areas that I felt would be worth the time to attend, otherwise I've used self-study for my MCSE studies from NT 3.51 right up to 2003 level. So I was fortunate in that I had this initial level of knowledge to build upon. I'm not crazy about CD-ROM training myself, I prefer to pick up a book but that of course is my personal preference. I hope that this helps :-)
2/4/05: praet123 from australia, perth says: Heya, Thanks for your reply :) Basically I was made redundant as a office junior and got lucky with an ISP and got employed as a PC Techie - mainly phone support and on-site work (setup net account, and fix minor win2k3 probs). I found that fun, until i got made redundant - again!! that was for only 12 months. now after 4 years since that job, i wish to further my career back in the IT field. I only have practical work experience and no certificates, only IT Tafe modules. What do u reckon about the MCDST cert? Wld u agree that wld be a good start to get a proper cert for my previous work in the industry and prior knowledge? and then progress to other courses eventually leading to a MCSE? Sorry for my life story, it's difficult for me as I really have no one to talk to about this... My thinking is: get the MCDST, get back in the IT field as phone and on-site techie... work my way up the ladder with MCP courses to lead to a MCSE? waste of time? Love to hear what you (and others!!) think :)
2/7/05: strauchr says: Thanks for getting back to me Greg. I understand how hetic things can get when your combing study and work! I've thought about the move to Sydney as there seems to be a lot more oportunites there but looks like I'll making a bigger move to London soon! Designing and engineering networks looks like my next step as I have done some of that already but not on a big enough scale and not enough of it. I like project management as I have done some of that as well but again not on a big enough scale. Hey praet123. I'm from Perth as well. Looks like an all aussie affair here. I started down the NT 4.0 path and changed when 2000 came out. I did the first two courses but had to back them up with books to study for the exam. After that I decided to do it all by books and creating my own lab with a server and a PC. I used all MS Press books which are heavy on reading but provide a very good structured learning path. To fund my study and exams I took a low paying job at a small company that gave me opportunities to learn hands on as well as pay for books, practise exams and exams. If your looking for help desk or desktop jobs look at getting your MCP and work for a small company that'll give you the opportunity to learn a large range of stuff on the job and hopefully will pay for some courses and/or exams. Also, go back and finish your TAFE course. I did that last year and it feels good to have it and it can be used as a pathway to uni. Tertiary qualifications help and when put together with an MCP and your experience should get you somewhere.
2/7/05: strauchr says: Greg - looking forward to your column about MCSE:Security - looks like my next cert.
2/19/05: Chris says: I know this is an off the wall question, but I am curious how to figure out when a certification gets phased out by the company that makes the certification. If anybody has any answers email me or post them on here.
First Page   Next Page   Last Page
Your comment about: “Closing Time”
Name: (optional)
Location: (optional)
E-mail Address: (optional)
Comment:
   

-- advertisement (story continued below) --

top