CertCities.com -- The Ultimate Site for Certified IT Professionals
Post Your Mind in the CertCities.com Forums Share share | bookmark | e-mail
  Microsoft®
  Cisco®
  Security
  Oracle®
  A+/Network+"
  Linux/Unix
  More Certs
  Newsletters
  Salary Surveys
  Forums
  News
  Exam Reviews
  Tips
  Columns
  Features
  PopQuiz
  RSS Feeds
  Press Releases
  Contributors
  About Us
  Search
 

Advanced Search
  Free Newsletter
  Sign-up for the #1 Weekly IT
Certification News
and Advice.
Subscribe to CertCities.com Free Weekly E-mail Newsletter
CertCities.com

See What's New on
Redmondmag.com!

Cover Story: IE8: Behind the 8 Ball

Tech-Ed: Let's (Third) Party!

A Secure Leap into the Cloud

Windows Mobile's New Moves

SQL Speed Secrets


CertCities.com
Let us know what you
think! E-mail us at:



 
 
...Home ... Editorial ... Columns ..Column Story Saturday: April 5, 2014


 Certification Advisor  
Greg Neilson
Greg Neilson


 MCSD, MCAD and You
Greg offers his two cents on the new developer certifications from Microsoft.
by Greg Neilson  
3/12/2002 -- Now that Microsoft has fleshed out the details of its new developer certifications, it's a good time to look into what exactly these titles offer. As I've commented before, Microsoft's developer certification program hasn't exploded the way the company's networking titles have – as ofJanuary 2, there were only 28,813 MCSDs, as compared to 436,599 MCSEs. It will be very interesting to see what impact these new certifications will have on these numbers.

As foreshadowed late last year, there are now two levels of developer certification – the MCSD for Microsoft .NET and the new MCAD (Microsoft Certified Application Developer), also for .NET. The new MCSD consists of five exams (it used to be four), and the MCAD has three exams -- a subset of those offered for the MCSD. Microsoft suggests that the MCSD is for lead developers who work on enterprise solutions, whereas the MCAD is aimed developers who work on department-level solutions. The additional core exam for MCSDs focuses on developing XML Web services with either Visual Basic .NET or Visual C# .NET. The MCAD doesn't have the MCSD requirement for a solution architecture exam, and has only one of the Web application development or Windows application development exams, the XML web services exam and an elective.

Most of the exams for these titles will beta in April and go live in June. However, the new 70-300 (Analyzing Requirements and Defining .NET Solution Architectures), a core exam for MCSD .NET, isn't expected until early next year. I can appreciate the need to get this new 70-300 exam designed correctly, but I'm a little surprised to hear it will take Microsoft nearly another year to have this ready -- in IT terms, that's a long time away.

The new .NET framework, together with the new C# language and/or Visual Basic .NET, represents a huge learning curve for existing developers who were already competent with Visual C++ and/or Visual Basic -- not unlike the gap the networking community faced earlier with Windows 2000 and the MCSE program. Therefore, I expect that many existing MCSDs have much to learn to master these new technologies. At the same time, I'm perplexed that there's no upgrade path for existing MCSDs; although their current MCSD won't expire, they'll need to take all five exams in order to achieve the new version of the title. Even most of the old MCSD electives are no longer valid. Why didn't Microsoft follow the same policy used with the MCSE and allowed expired electives to be used as part of the current certifications? Surely not everything that MCSDs have known about programming on the Windows platform is now obsolete! At the very least, Microsoft could give current MCSDs a couple of free exam vouchers to be applied to the new exams. Given how serious Microsoft is about the all-pervasive nature of .NET -- with TV adverts and all -- it's good business to have more expert .NET evangelists who can spread the word.

The new MCSD for .NET program presents an issue for those currently considering or working the MCSD. Given that there is no upgrade path for the "old" MCSD to the new, it's hard to make a case for continuing on with the old program. Even so, the exams won't be live until June, meaning there probably won't be much in the way of exam resources until 4th quarter 2002. Because there is so much to learn, getting deep into it now is a great idea. Of course, there's nothing saying you need to use self-study resources anyway to prepare for exams: In the past, I've used product knowledge combined with the online manuals and, of course, the objectives to prepare for exams. Although this is a longer process than following a self-study book, I've found it to be an excellent way to learn lots about the topic AND pass the exams.

If you plan to get this certification, I recommend you get moving ASAP. Sure, everyone who develops on Microsoft platforms will need to get a grasp of this material eventually, but by becoming an early adopter and, hopefully, an expert with these technologies, you could use that knowledge to really further your career. The bottom line? The sooner you master working with Visual Studio .NET, the better.

What you do think about these new certifications? Are you planning to complete one of them? Let me know by posting your comments below.


Greg Neilson, MCSE+Internet, MCNE, PCLP, is a Contributing Editor for Microsoft Certified Professional Magazine and a manager at a large IT services firm in Australia. He's the author of Lotus Domino Administration in a Nutshell (O'Reilly and Associates, ISBN 1-56592-717-6). You can reach him at Attn: Greg.

 


More articles by Greg Neilson:

-- advertisement --


There are 42 CertCities.com user Comments for “MCSD, MCAD and You”
Page 1 of 5
3/14/02: Navin Dhanuka says: Can u guide to the available resources for getting started asap. Ya. I am new to the VS platform.
3/14/02: Mike Hasemann says: Where are the ASP.NET certs? ASP.NET is probably going to be the most widely-used platform of the 3 (C## or VB.NET). It just seems odd to me that Microsoft has yet again ignored coming up with a cert path for their main web piece. If anything, I would think the ASP.NET could be a little more comprehensive than the others even since it could require knowledge on a little bit of everything (vb.net, c##, sql, and XML) for one test.
3/14/02: Pat McDermott-Wells says: MS did not allow "expired" electives to be used for the new MCSE, only current electives. For many MCSEs, there was no "upgrade path" because the electives they had used for NT were expired - so they had to take all of the new exams.
3/14/02: Greg Neilson says: Pat, take another look at the current electives listed for the (Win2k) MCSE. MS changed their policies last October and older discontinued exams such as TCP/IP and IIS 4.0 were then allowable as electives. Check out http://www.microsoft.com/traincert/mcp/mcse/requirements.asp
3/15/02: Rinaldo says: I feel that Microsoft does not pay the same atention to the MCSD program that they pay to the MCSE program. Maybe because of this, there are so few MCSD around the world. If they don't want to create an upgrade path, maybe special materials dedicated to MCSD people that wants to upgrade be ok. What do you think?
3/15/02: Todd says: I'm a hiring manager in a technical consulting firm. I interview candidates all the time. It is my opinion that real world experience in a technology is FAR more important than holding a certification.
3/15/02: Greg Neilson says: Todd, Sure experience is very important, but rather than seeing this as simply certification vs experience, wouldn't you prefer to see candidates with both?
3/15/02: Jeff says: I currently hold both an MCSD and an MCSE/Win2000. However, development is my bread and butter (I only hold the MCSE/W2K from a curiosity and general knowledge standpoint). I recently bought a brand new machine to setup at home so I can start playing with ASP.NET and VB.NET. I am going to try to figure out as much as possible even before the exams come out. Then I will try to jump on the exams (maybe even the BETAS if I'm selected) as they come out. From what I have seen of it so far it's a very comprehensive programming environment, and it should greatly simplify n-tier development over the traditional ASP/COM/HTTPCall architecture. I am looking forward to the changes, and the fact that we will have to take all 5 exams over again is, in my opinion, not a big deal because I plan to dig in and learn it all anyway. However, I would agree that it would be nice for Microsoft to have thrown in a few free vouchers for current MCSD's to entice them to renew their certifications.
3/17/02: Luke says: Thanks for sharing Todd - I'm sure your input has been very useful to everyone here who is considering the MS dev certs. The certification vs experience debate is getting a bit tired now. Why would you assume the 2 are mutually exclusive? I agree with Jeff, if the .NET platform is fundamentally different then it makes sense that there is a seperate certification track, there is no real complaint if you get to keep your original certification status.
3/23/02: Michael Styles says: Hey, trying out the Microsoft Office User Specialist certifications. You can really be second-fiddle there.
First Page   Next Page   Last Page
Your comment about: “MCSD, MCAD and You”
Name: (optional)
Location: (optional)
E-mail Address: (optional)
Comment:
   

-- advertisement (story continued below) --

top